profile search
latest updates
Press Release
25 Mar | Thursday
RAM Ratings assigns AA1(bg) rating to Agroto’s ASEAN Sustainability SRI Sukuk
RAM Ratings has assigned a preliminary AA1(bg)/Stable rating to the proposed RM200 mil 5-year tranche under Agroto Business (M) Sdn Bhd’s (Agroto or the Company) ASEAN Sustainability SRI Sukuk Programme of up to RM300 mil. The assigned rating reflects an irrevocable and unconditional guarantee from Sabah Development Bank Berhad (rated AA1/Stable/P1), which enhances the rating beyond Agroto’s stand-alone credit fundamentals. The proceeds will be used to restructure Agroto’s existing bank borrowings, set up a pre-funded reserve account for its profit payments, settle issuance expenses, and finance its future working capital as well as capex. 
 
Agroto was incorporated in 2012, in partnership with the Perak state government - through Perak State Agricultural Development Corporation (SADC). Its mandate is to initiate and implement integrated sustainable vegetable farming in the highlands of Kinta District, Perak. SADC had contributed the 75-year land use rights on the 2,596-acre site as part of the capital for its 20% interest in the joint venture. Agroto is 60%-owned by CH Kinta Valley Sdn Bhd and 20%-held by CH Kinta Green Valley Sdn Bhd. These two companies are in turn controlled by the Chai founding family. 
 
Agroto is a notable highland vegetable grower in Malaysia, with 101 acres of planted area (as at end-September 2020) and a monthly output of almost 1,000 tonnes. Agroto distinguishes itself through modern planting methods and superior product quality. The Company currently meets all the major certification standards in terms of environmental responsibility as well as food safety and handling. It also boasts prominent customers in the retail and F&B sectors while being able to tap the export market. Agroto’s farming operations are further complemented by collection, processing, packing and storage infrastructure. Despite the movement restrictions imposed amid the COVID-19 pandemic, Agroto’s farm has remained fully operational, unlike smaller farmers whose operations had been affected.
 
Independent of the bank guarantee, Agroto has a weak stand-alone credit profile. The intensely competitive and highly fragmented vegetable production industry, along with the Company’s lack of scale economies, has been exerting immense pressure on its operating performance. This has strained its cashflow, leading to a fragile liquidity position. It only had less than RM1 mil of unrestricted cash reserves as at end-September 2020. 
 
The transaction documents require two profit payments in the first year to be pre-funded and set aside in the Finance Payment Account, besides the minimum required balance of one profit payment in the Finance Service Reserve Account. Part of the sukuk proceeds (of RM15 mil-RM20 mil) have also been earmarked as working capital and capital expenditure (capex), thus providing some respite against Agroto’s cashflow constraints. In the past, shareholder support in the form of a capital injection and advances to Agroto had helped ease liquidity woes. 
 
Agroto’s credit profile is also tempered by its substantial exposure to customer and product concentration risks. The Company’s top five customers (leading retailers and F&B chains) contributed over 70% of its sales in FY Dec 2019 and 9M FY Dec 2020. This renders Agroto’s performance susceptible to changes in its customers’ fortunes or procurement policies. Similarly, Agroto’s top five crops accounted for some 79% of its sales in 9M FY Dec 2020. Successful expansion of its planted area and market reach will be crucial to the improvement of its financial limitations.
 
Published on 24 March 2021.
 
Analytical contact
Amy Lo 
(603) 3385 2509
amy@ram.com.my
 
Media contact
Padthma Subbiah
(603) 3385 2577
padthma@ram.com.my
 
The credit rating is not a recommendation to purchase, sell or hold a security, inasmuch as it does not comment on the security’s market price or its suitability for a particular investor, nor does it involve any audit by RAM Ratings. The credit rating also does not reflect the legality and enforceability of financial obligations.
 
RAM Ratings receives compensation for its rating services, normally paid by the issuers of such securities or the rated entity, and sometimes third parties participating in marketing the securities, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, underwriters, etc. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on RAM Ratings’ credit opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, RAM Ratings is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity and independence of its ratings. Rating fees are communicated to clients prior to the issuance of rating opinions. While RAM Ratings reserves the right to disseminate the ratings, it receives no payment for doing so, except for subscriptions to its publications.
 
Similarly, the disclaimers above also apply to RAM Ratings’ credit-related analyses and commentaries, where relevant.
 
© Copyright 2021 by RAM Rating Services Berhad
source: RAM Ratings
Print Mail Twitter LinkedIn Facebook Google+
Past Articles
2021
May
April
March
February
January
2020
December
November
October
September
August
June
February
January
2019
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
January
2018
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January
2017
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January
2016
December
November
September
July
June
May
April
March
2015
June
May
April
March
February
January
2014
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January
2013
December
October
July
May
April
March
2012
December