profile search
latest updates
Press Release
18 Feb | Thursday
RAM Ratings reaffirms Manjung Island Energy’ sukuk ratings
RAM Ratings has reaffirmed the AAA/Stable rating of Manjung Island Energy Berhad’s (MIEB) RM3.86 bil Islamic Securities (2011/2030) (Series 1) and also the enhanced AAA(s)/Stable rating of its RM990 mil Islamic Securities (2011/2031) (Series 2). The reaffirmed rating of Series 1 is premised on our expectation that the debt coverage for Series 1 will remain strong despite the operational issues that TNB Janamanjung Sdn Bhd (TNBJ or the Company) had encountered.  
 
TNBJ is the sole source of cashflow for MIEB, a trust-owned special purpose vehicle established to raise funding for the construction of a 1,010 MW coal-fired power plant (GF2), which is located next to the coal-fired Sultan Azlan Shah power plant in Perak (GF1) with 2,070 MW of dependable capacity (collectively, the Facilities). Given this, we recognise the strong credit link between MIEB and TNBJ, and view both companies in aggregate. The reaffirmed enhanced rating of Series 2 reflects the irrevocable and unconditional guarantee from the ultimate parent of TNBJ, Tenaga Nasional Berhad (TNB, rated AAA/Stable by RAM). 
 
TNBJ boasts a strong business profile, backed by the terms of its Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) with TNB for GF1 and GF2. Subject to operating within the parameters of the PPAs, the Company is entitled to earn full available capacity payments (ACPs), regardless of the quantum of electricity generated.  It is also able to pass through fuel cost fluctuations to TNB via energy payments. 
 
Due to a malfunctioning rotor in one of its units since August 2019, GF1 ended the year with 3,222 hours of forced outages (2018: 776 hours). This had resulted in RM158 mil of ACP losses in 2019. While the problem was fixed in February 2020, the Company had incurred ACP losses of RM81 mil in 1H 2020. Meanwhile, GF2 has been affected by intermittent operational disruptions, with 555 hours of forced outages and RM5.2 mil of ACP losses in 2019 (2018: 425 hours and RM8.9 mil). As such, our sensitised cashflow maintains the assumption of some underperformance by both GF1 and GF2.  
 
Pursuant to the reorganisation plan announced by TNB, all the operation and maintenance (O&M) works of its power-generating subsidiaries, including TNBJ, will be carried out by a new entity, i.e. TNB Power Generation Sdn Bhd (TNB Genco). Under the new arrangement, TNBJ will benefit from the technical expertise of TNB Genco and a loss-sharing mechanism courtesy of the performance guarantees provided by TNB Genco via liquidated damages. In return, TNBJ will have to pay the latter O&M fees, which will gradually increase its operating expenses going forward.
 
Taking into account the incremental operating expenses, outages at the plant, and some distributions on its redeemable preference shares, RAM’s sensitised cashflow projections indicate that TNBJ will still be able to register respective minimum and average annual finance service coverage ratios of 2.0 and 4.9 times (with cash balances, post-distribution) throughout the tenure of Series 1. Supported by its well-matched debt-repayment profile, comfortable cash holdings and stringent covenants under Series 1, the Company’s debt coverage remains solid. TNBJ will continue to be cautious with respect to its future distributions in aim of preserving its debt coverage. 
 
Meanwhile, Series 2 has been structured with a RM990 mil bullet principal repayment due on 25 November 2031. TNBJ is anticipated to be able to meet this obligation as it has been building up its cash balances to meet the repayments of Series 2. Its profit payments, meanwhile, rank equally with those of Series 1 in terms of cash distributions during the tenure of Series 1.
 
 
Analytical contact
Goh Kwan Kheen, Timothy
(603) 3385 2496
timothy@ram.com.my
 
Media contact
Padthma Subbiah
(603) 3385 2577
padthma@ram.com.my
 
Date of release:  15 February 2021
 
 
The credit rating is not a recommendation to purchase, sell or hold a security, inasmuch as it does not comment on the security’s market price or its suitability for a particular investor, nor does it involve any audit by RAM Ratings. The credit rating also does not reflect the legality and enforceability of financial obligations.
 
RAM Ratings receives compensation for its rating services, normally paid by the issuers of such securities or the rated entity, and sometimes third parties participating in marketing the securities, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, underwriters, etc. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on RAM Ratings’ credit opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, RAM Ratings is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity and independence of its ratings. Rating fees are communicated to clients prior to the issuance of rating opinions. While RAM Ratings reserves the right to disseminate the ratings, it receives no payment for doing so, except for subscriptions to its publications.
 
Similarly, the disclaimers above also apply to RAM Ratings’ credit-related analyses and commentaries, where relevant.
 
Copyright 2021 by RAM Rating Services Berhad
source: RAM Ratings
Print Mail Twitter LinkedIn Facebook Google+
Past Articles
2021
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January
2020
December
November
October
September
August
June
February
January
2019
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
January
2018
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January
2017
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January
2016
December
November
September
July
June
May
April
March
2015
June
May
April
March
February
January
2014
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January
2013
December
October
July
May
April
March
2012
December